Clare Ardern (0000-0001-8102-3631)

Personal information

Biography

With expertise in sports medicine, rehabilitation and meta-research, Dr. Ardern’s work focuses on (i) measuring the impact of health research on public policy, the economy and society, (ii) how high-calibre meta-research (including systematic reviews, network meta-analyses, and clinical practice guidelines) can help clinicians make quality decisions, and (iii) return to sport after injury (rates, determinants of success, improving the clinical approach).

Activities

Collapse all

Karolinska Institutet: Stockholm, SE

(Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society)

Employment

Clare Ardern

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8102-3631

Personal information

Emails & domains

Verified email domains

Other IDs

Keywords

Countries

Biography

Activities

Employment (8)

Karolinska Institutet: Stockholm, SE

University of British Columbia: Vancouver, CA

Linköpings universitet Institutionen för medicin och hälsa: Linkoping, SE

The University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine: Vancouver, BC, CA

Linköpings universitet: Linkoping, SE

Aspetar Qatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital: Doha, Ad Dawhah, QA

Linköping University: Linköping, Östergötland, SE

La Trobe University: Bundoora, VIC, AU

Education and qualifications (2)

La Trobe University: Bundoora, VIC, AU

La Trobe University: Bundoora, VIC, AU

Professional activities (1)

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy: Alexandria, Virginia, US

Works (50 of 94)

Threats to grant peer review: a qualitative study

Can Surgeons or Patients Predict the Likelihood of Improvement With Nonoperative Treatment of Chronic Tennis Elbow?

A Change-Point Method to Detect Meaningful Change in Return-to-Sport Progression in Athletes

Judgement and Decision Making in Clinical and Return-to-Sports Decision Making: A Narrative Review

Consensus methods in patellofemoral pain: how rigorous are they? A scoping review

The Physical Demands of Wheelchair Tennis Match Play: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis

What Factors are Important to the Success of Resubmitted Grant Applications in Health Research? A Retrospective Study of Over 20,000 Applications to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research

#Sportskongres2024: from science to practice

GPT for RCTs?: Using AI to determine adherence to reporting guidelines

The effects of eating frequency on changes in body composition and cardiometabolic health in adults: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized trials

Ranking versus rating in peer review of research grant applications

Sport and exercise medicine/physiotherapy publishing has a gender/sex equity problem: we need action now!

Infographic. Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome—natural history of primary cam morphology to inform clinical practice and research priorities on conditions affecting the young person’s hip

Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1—definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes

Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 2—research priorities on conditions affecting the young person’s hip

Association between the level of partial foot amputation and gait: a scoping review with implications for the minimum impairment criteria for wheelchair tennis

Evaluating prospective study registration and result reporting of trials conducted in Canada from 2009 to 2019

Three years of quality assurance data assessing the performance of over 4000 grant peer review contributions to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Project Grant Competition

A Framework for Clinicians to Improve the Decision-Making Process in Return to Sport

Assessment of muscle strength in para-athletes: A systematic review of observational studies

Characteristics of Complex Systems in Sports Injury Rehabilitation: Examples and Implications for Practice

Evaluating prospective study registration and result reporting of trials conducted in Canada from 2009-2019

A Psychological Support Intervention to Help Injured Athletes “Get Back in the Game”: Design and Development Study

Writing up your clinical trial report for a scientific journal: the REPORT trial guide for effective and transparent research reporting without spin

Reaching consensus within patellofemoral pain research: Protocol for a scoping review

It is time for consensus on ‘consensus statements’

Implementing the 27 PRISMA 2020 Statement items for systematic reviews in the sport and exercise medicine, musculoskeletal rehabilitation and sports science fields: the PERSiST (implementing Prisma in Exercise, Rehabilitation, Sport medicine and SporTs science) guidance

Assessing implementation, limited efficacy, and acceptability of the BEAST tool: A rehabilitation and return-to-sport decision tool for nonprofessional athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Primary cam morphology; bump, burden or bog-standard? A concept analysis

Writing up your clinical trial report for a scientific journal: The REPORT trial guide for effective and transparent research reporting without spin

Counting publications and citations is not just irrelevant: it is an incentive that subverts the impact of clinical research

Prevalence and risk factors for back pain in sports: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Treating low back pain in athletes: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Which treatment is most effective for patients with Achilles tendinopathy? A living systematic review with network meta-analysis of 29 randomised controlled trials

Developing a psychological support intervention to help injured athletes get Back in the Game

Low correlation between functional performance and patient reported outcome measures in individuals with non-surgically treated ACL injury

BAck iN the Game (BANG) – a smartphone application to help athletes return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: protocol for a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial

When taking a step back is a veritable leap forward. Reversing decades of arthroscopy for managing joint pain: five reasons that could explain declining rates of common arthroscopic surgeries

Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews

Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 2: Spot the difference - a rigorous risk of bias assessment can alter the main findings of a systematic review

Evidence too weak to guide surgical treatment decisions for anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review of the risk of new meniscal tears after anterior cruciate ligament injury

Return-to-Play Practices Following Hamstring Injury: A Worldwide Survey of 131 Premier League Football Teams

Concussed athletes walk slower than non-concussed athletes during cognitive-motor dual-task assessments but not during single-task assessments 2 months after sports concussion: a systematic review and meta-analysis using individual participant data

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Psychological factors and future performance of football players: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Which criteria are used to clear patients to return to sport after primary ACL reconstruction? A scoping review

Zombie reviews taking over the PROSPERO systematic review registry. It’s time to fight back!

Infographic. Unravelling confusion in sports medicine and science practice: a systematic approach

Want to improve return to sport outcomes following injury? Empower, engage, provide feedback and be transparent: 4 habits!

Was it a good idea to combine the studies? Why clinicians should care about heterogeneity when making decisions based on systematic reviews